Remember when browsers were just tools to access the internet? Those simpler days seem increasingly distant as I read about Perplexity’s latest announcement regarding their new browser that plans to track “everything users do online” for hyper-personalized advertising. The brazenness of this declaration is both shocking and sadly unsurprising.

The tech industry’s relentless push toward surveillance capitalism has reached a new milestone. Gone are the days of subtle privacy invasions buried in lengthy terms of service agreements. Now, companies proudly announce their intentions to monitor every aspect of our digital lives, packaging it as a feature rather than the privacy nightmare it truly is.

The tech industry never ceases to amaze me with its tone-deaf approaches to user privacy. Today’s exhibit: Perplexity’s CEO proudly announcing their new browser will track everything users do online to deliver “hyper-personalized” ads. Reading this news over my morning batch brew, I couldn’t help but wonder if we’ve entered some bizarre parallel universe where privacy invasion is now a selling point.

Let’s be clear about something - nobody is sitting at home thinking, “Gee, I wish my browser would track me more thoroughly so I can get better ads!” The sheer disconnect between Silicon Valley executives and actual users has reached new heights of absurdity.

Looking at the recent news about Discord implementing face scanning for age verification, I’m struck by a familiar sinking feeling. The same one I got when Facebook started pushing for real names, when Instagram began demanding phone numbers, and now as Discord joins the parade of platforms wanting to scan our faces.

The justification seems reasonable enough on the surface - protecting minors online is crucial. But there’s something deeply unsettling about a company that already has a questionable track record with privacy now wanting biometric data from its users. This is the same platform that has consistently refused to implement end-to-end encryption, claiming it would only benefit criminals.

The tech world is buzzing with Microsoft’s latest announcement about reintroducing the Recall feature into Windows, and not in a good way. Having spent decades in IT, watching the evolution of Windows from a simple operating system to what it’s becoming today has been quite the journey - and not entirely a pleasant one.

Remember when we actually owned our computers? When the operating system was just that - a system to operate our machine? Those days seem increasingly distant as Microsoft continues its march toward turning Windows into a data-harvesting platform disguised as a helpful tool.

The tech world is buzzing with news of Tailscale’s latest funding round, and my notification feeds are lighting up with concerned users discussing what this might mean for the future of the service. Sitting here in my home office, watching the autumn leaves fall outside my window, I can’t help but feel a familiar sense of dread.

Remember when Reddit was just a gathering place for communities? Or when LastPass was the password manager everyone recommended? The pattern is dishearteningly familiar - a beloved service gains popularity, attracts investor attention, and then begins the slow descent into what’s now termed “enshittification.” It’s like watching a slow-motion train wreck, and many of us in the self-hosted community are bracing for impact.

Yesterday’s announcement about Gmail’s end-to-end encryption had me rolling my eyes harder than when my daughter tries to convince me TikTok is perfectly safe. Google’s latest attempt to appear privacy-conscious feels about as genuine as a $3 note.

Let’s be crystal clear about what’s happening here. This isn’t true end-to-end encryption (E2EE) being offered to regular Gmail users. Instead, it’s a corporate-focused feature specifically designed for Google Workspace customers who actually pay for their services. The reasoning isn’t hard to follow - Google’s bread and butter comes from scanning our emails to feed their advertising machine.

Reading about a journalist’s investigation into police surveillance cameras in rural Virginia sent chills down my spine this morning. The investigation revealed an extensive network of automated license plate readers (ALPRs) tracking vehicles across hundreds of miles, and it got me thinking about our own surveillance situation here.

Remember when the biggest privacy concern was speed cameras on the Eastern Freeway? Those days seem quaint now. We’re living in an era where our movements are constantly monitored, logged, and stored in databases that can be accessed with frightening ease.

The internet has always been a double-edated sword when it comes to privacy. Sitting here in my home office, watching the rain pelt against my window (typical Melbourne weather), I’ve been following a concerning story about an educational institution attempting to unmask an anonymous Reddit user who criticized their safety policies.

This isn’t just another tale of institutional overreach - it’s a stark reminder of how fragile our online privacy really is. The story revolves around a school board seeking court orders to reveal the identity of someone who voiced concerns about safety issues following a tragic incident. Rather than addressing these concerns head-on, they’ve chosen to pursue legal action to identify and potentially silence their critic.

Last night’s incident outside Rod Laver Arena during the Billie Eilish concert has left me fuming. Two grown men thought it would be hilarious to intimidate a 10-year-old girl, shoving a phone in her face and demanding she name Chicago Bulls players because she was wearing the team’s merchandise. This isn’t content creation - it’s harassment, plain and simple.

The digital age has transformed our relationship with public spaces. Every moment seems to be fair game for someone’s social media feed, turning casual outings into potential content without consent. What’s particularly disturbing is how these self-proclaimed content creators specifically target those who seem vulnerable - young girls at a concert, people working out at gyms, or anyone they think might give them the reaction they’re hunting for.

Looking at the latest browser drama unfolding, I’m getting flashbacks to the Internet Explorer days. Microsoft’s recent move to disable uBlock Origin and other extensions in Edge feels like history repeating itself, but with a fresh coat of corporate paint.

The tech landscape has shifted dramatically since those early browser wars. Edge, built on Chromium, was actually becoming a decent browser. But Microsoft seems determined to follow Google down the path of prioritizing advertising revenue over user experience and privacy.

The tech world is buzzing with Apple’s recent decision to pull Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK, following pressure from the British government. This move has sparked intense discussions about privacy, government overreach, and the future of digital security.

Let’s be clear about what’s happening here. Apple didn’t implement a backdoor - they simply removed the enhanced encryption feature for UK users. While this isn’t ideal, it’s arguably better than compromising the entire encryption system with a government-mandated backdoor. At least now, UK users know exactly where they stand regarding their data security.

Looking through my phone this morning, scrolling past countless photos of my teenage daughter’s school events and family gatherings, I found myself thinking about digital privacy. Recent news about law enforcement officers sharing a woman’s private photos after an illegal phone search has left me feeling deeply unsettled.

The digital age has brought unprecedented challenges to our privacy. While most of us worry about hackers or corporate data breaches, there’s an equally concerning threat from those who are supposed to protect us. The incident where deputies accessed and shared a woman’s intimate photos without consequences isn’t just a violation of privacy - it’s an abuse of power that should shock anyone who values basic human dignity.

The self-hosting community is experiencing a fascinating shift in sentiment regarding media servers, particularly around Plex and its open-source alternative, Jellyfin. This debate hits close to home for me, as I’ve spent countless hours setting up and maintaining media servers in my home office.

The core issue that keeps surfacing is the fundamental disconnect between what self-hosting should mean and what some popular solutions actually deliver. When we talk about self-hosting, we’re essentially discussing taking control of our digital services. Yet, ironically, some of the most popular self-hosted solutions still tether us to external dependencies.

The recent news about the UK government ordering Apple to disable Advanced Data Protection has sent shockwaves through the tech community, and rightfully so. This isn’t just another local policy decision - it’s a concerning move that could have global implications for digital privacy.

Standing at my desk in my home office, looking at my iPhone and MacBook, I’m struck by the irony of the situation. Here we are, living in an era where digital security is more crucial than ever, yet governments seem determined to tear down the very protections we need.

The recent lawsuit against LinkedIn by its Premium customers has stirred up quite a storm in the tech community. Premium subscribers discovered their private messages were allegedly shared with third parties for AI training without their consent. This revelation hits particularly close to home, having been a LinkedIn Premium subscriber myself during various job transitions over the years.

Many of us in the tech industry have long maintained a love-hate relationship with LinkedIn. It’s like that questionable relative you have to invite to family gatherings – you don’t particularly like them, but you can’t exactly cut them out. The platform has become an unavoidable necessity for professional networking, especially in the technology sector.

Looking at the latest controversy surrounding Meta’s platforms, where they’ve mysteriously “hidden” posts about abortion pill providers, I’m struck by how predictable these “accidents” have become. The timing is particularly interesting, isn’t it? Just as reproductive rights become an increasingly heated political issue.

Remember when tech platforms were supposed to democratize information and give everyone a voice? Those idealistic days feel like ancient history now. These days, it seems every week brings another convenient “bug” that just happens to align with certain political interests.

The recent exodus of TikTok users to RedNote has left me both fascinated and deeply troubled. While sitting in my home office, watching this digital migration unfold, I can’t shake the feeling that we’re witnessing something more significant than just another app-switching trend.

The supposed logic behind this move is striking - users are protesting TikTok’s potential ban by jumping to an app with even stronger ties to the very concerns that sparked the ban discussion in the first place. It’s like watching someone protest food safety regulations by deliberately eating at an establishment with worse health violations.

Remember when hosting your own services was considered a bit nerdy and perhaps unnecessary? Well, times have certainly changed. The self-hosting movement has gained serious momentum lately, and it’s not just tech enthusiasts jumping on board anymore.

Scrolling through this week’s self-hosting newsletter, I noticed an interesting trend emerging. More folks are moving away from corporate-controlled platforms and embracing self-hosted alternatives. The fascinating part isn’t just the technology itself, but the growing awareness of digital sovereignty among everyday users.

The recent lawsuit against Allstate in Texas has sparked an interesting debate about data privacy and insurance companies. The allegations that Allstate paid app developers to secretly collect driver data are concerning, but frankly, not surprising.

Working in tech for over two decades, I’ve watched the evolution of data collection from simple website cookies to the intricate web of surveillance we navigate today. The insurance industry’s shift towards usage-based pricing was inevitable, but the methods being employed are increasingly questionable.

Remember when mobile apps were just fun little diversions? Looking at the recent Wired article about location tracking through apps feels like watching a horror movie where the call is coming from inside the house. The scale of surveillance through seemingly innocent apps like Candy Crush and MyFitnessPal is staggering.

The tech industry has been playing fast and loose with our data for years, but this revelation takes it to a new level. Even when you explicitly deny location permissions, advertisers can still track you through IP addresses, WiFi networks, and even Bluetooth signals. The sheer number of compromised apps - over 15,000 - is mind-boggling. Just scrolling through the list made my stomach turn.

The recent buzz around self-hosted alternatives to Google services has got me thinking about my own digital autonomy journey. Don’t get me wrong - this isn’t about bashing Google. Their services are polished and convenient, but there’s something deeply satisfying about taking control of your digital life.

My home server, humming away in the study, has become quite the Swiss Army knife of services. The star of the show lately has been Immich, a remarkably capable alternative to Google Photos. What started as a curious experiment has turned into my primary photo management solution. The face recognition feature works surprisingly well, even on my modest hardware, and the ability to share libraries between family members is brilliant.

The tech community is buzzing about Moondream’s latest 2B vision-language model release, particularly its gaze detection capabilities. While the technical achievement is impressive, the implications are giving me serious pause.

Picture this: an AI system that can track exactly where people are looking in any video. The possibilities range from fascinating to frightening. Some developers are already working on scripts to implement this technology on webcams and existing video footage. The enthusiasm in the tech community is palpable, with creators rushing to build tools and applications around this capability.

The recent revelation about Motorola’s ALPR systems leaking live video feeds and vehicle data has got me thinking about the surveillance state we’ve sleepwalked into. Sitting in traffic on Hoddle Street this morning, I found myself counting the number of cameras pointing at my car - traffic cameras, security cameras, and who knows what else.

Remember when we thought automatic number plate recognition was just about catching unregistered vehicles and toll dodgers? Those were simpler times. Now we’re learning that in just 20 minutes, one of these systems in Nashville captured data from nearly 1,000 vehicles. That’s not just license plates - we’re talking about detailed information about vehicle makes, models, and even photos.

Remember when tech companies used to ask for permission before accessing our personal data? Those days seem increasingly distant, especially with Apple’s latest move to automatically opt everyone into AI-powered photo analysis.

The tech giant has quietly introduced a feature called “Enhanced Visual Search” that analyzes users’ photos using AI technology - and they’ve made it opt-out rather than opt-in. While they claim the system uses homomorphic encryption to protect privacy, the concerning part isn’t just about the technology itself - it’s about the principle of consent.

The digital footprints we leave behind seem to multiply exponentially these days. Just last week, while checking my credit report (something I do religiously every few months), I stumbled upon a disturbing revelation that made me pause my batch brew mid-sip.

It turns out that simply checking your credit report can trigger automatic updates to various data aggregators like White Pages. The implications of this seemingly innocuous connection between services are frankly terrifying. While we’re all busy trying to protect our privacy in obvious ways - declining cookies, using secure passwords, maybe even dabbling with VPNs - our data is being traded behind the scenes like footy cards at a primary school.

The automotive industry’s hypocrisy regarding consumer privacy has reached new heights, prompting a rare bipartisan response from US senators. While these companies zealously guard their repair monopolies under the pretense of “protecting consumer privacy,” they’re simultaneously selling our personal data to insurance companies and other third parties without batting an eye.

Living in a car-dependent outer suburb of Melbourne, I’ve experienced firsthand the frustration of dealing with manufacturer-authorized service centers. Last month, my daughter’s first car - a modest Japanese hatchback - needed repairs. The quote from the authorized dealer was eye-watering, nearly triple what my local mechanic estimated. But thanks to manufacturer restrictions, the local workshop couldn’t access the necessary diagnostic tools.

The digital photography landscape has long been dominated by tech giants who’ve turned our precious memories into commodities. Standing at my desk this morning, scrolling through my photo library, I found myself marveling at how far we’ve come in reclaiming control of our personal data.

The open-source photo management solution Immich has been making waves in the self-hosting community, and their 2024 recap showcases exactly why. From humble beginnings on Reddit to securing funding that allows full-time development, it’s a success story that resonates deeply with those of us who value digital sovereignty.

Something rather unsettling happened on Reddit recently. Users discovered that comments they had deliberately overwritten and deleted years ago have mysteriously reappeared on their profiles. This isn’t just a minor glitch - it’s a stark reminder of how little control we actually have over our digital footprint.

The incident sparked quite a discussion about data retention practices. Several users shared their frustration upon finding their carefully scrubbed content had been restored without their consent. What’s particularly concerning is that many had used third-party tools specifically designed to help manage their digital privacy, only to find these efforts completely undermined.

The recent surge in porch pirates and the general desire to keep our homes secure has many of us looking into security cameras. But the market has become a minefield of subscription-based services, turning what should be a one-time purchase into yet another monthly drain on our bank accounts.

Yesterday, while browsing through various online discussions about security cameras, I noticed a clear trend emerging. The community seems to be gravitating towards two main contenders in the subscription-free space: Eufy and Reolink. What caught my attention wasn’t just the number of recommendations, but the consistent praise for their reliability and feature sets.

Remember when the internet felt like the wild west of freedom and anonymity? Those days seem increasingly distant, particularly with the recent revelations about Reddit’s deepening integration with Google’s surveillance infrastructure.

Looking through my browser’s developer tools this morning, I noticed something disturbing - Reddit’s new interface (affectionately nicknamed “shreddit” by many) pings Google’s reCAPTCHA servers on every single page load. Not just during login, but every single time you view anything. This goes far beyond the typical bot prevention measures we’re familiar with.

Looking for a new job has always been stressful, but recent developments in hiring practices are taking things to an unsettling new level. While scrolling through tech forums during my lunch break at a cafe near Flinders Street, I stumbled upon numerous discussions about HireVue, an AI-powered interview platform that’s becoming increasingly prevalent in government recruitment.

The concept is straightforward but troubling: instead of speaking with an actual human being, job candidates record themselves answering predetermined questions. The system then analyses everything from voice patterns to facial expressions, supposedly determining if you’re a “good fit” for the role. It’s like something straight out of Black Mirror, except it’s happening right now.

Standing in my home office, staring at the humming server rack tucked away in the corner, I reflected on how much things have changed over the past year. The journey into self-hosting started innocently enough with a simple Raspberry Pi running Pi-hole to block ads across our home network. Now, that modest beginning has snowballed into what my wife lovingly calls “that computer thing you’re always tinkering with.”

The online self-hosting community has been buzzing lately about various setups and must-have applications. Reading through different configurations, it’s fascinating to see how people approach their digital independence differently. Some focus on media management, others on productivity tools, and quite a few on privacy-focused alternatives to popular cloud services.

Remember when the scariest thing about having a robot vacuum was whether it might eat your charging cables? Those were simpler times. The recent revelation about Roomba test footage ending up on Facebook has left me feeling both frustrated and concerned about the direction we’re heading with smart home technology.

Sitting here in my study, watching my own robot vacuum methodically cleaning the house, I’m struck by how easily we’ve welcomed these devices into our most private spaces. The story about beta testers’ private moments being shared on social media is particularly disturbing, even if they had technically “consented” to data collection.

The recent clash between Cloudflare and EU regulators has sparked an important conversation about digital privacy that hits close to home. While sipping my morning coffee and scrolling through tech news at my favourite Brunswick café, this story caught my eye, particularly because it reflects a broader struggle we’re all facing in the digital age.

Remember the days when the internet felt like the wild west? Those simpler times when we didn’t have to worry about every click being monitored? Now, we’re dealing with an increasingly complex web of surveillance and control, often justified under the banner of fighting piracy and protecting intellectual property.

The gaming giant Valve just made another consumer-friendly move by requiring developers to explicitly disclose when their games use kernel-level anti-cheat systems. While this might sound like technical jargon to some, it’s actually a significant step forward for transparency and user privacy.

Sitting here in my home office, glancing at my Steam library, I’m reminded of how far we’ve come from the days when gaming platforms treated users as mere wallet-carriers. Valve has consistently shown that it’s possible to run a profitable business while respecting user privacy and choice. Their move away from Google Analytics, preference for privacy-focused solutions, and tireless work on Linux gaming through Proton demonstrates a commitment that goes beyond mere lip service.

Remember when we used to joke about people walking around with computers on their faces? Well, that future is here, and it’s far more unsettling than we imagined. Recently, two clever university students demonstrated just how vulnerable we all are to surveillance by combining smart glasses with facial recognition and data mining.

The demonstration was honestly chilling. These students managed to modify a pair of smart glasses to identify random people on the street, pulling up their personal information in real-time. Phone numbers, addresses, and other private details - all available at a glance. The most disturbing part? One demonstration showed a woman who, upon hearing the student mention details about their previous connection, immediately felt at ease speaking with a complete stranger.

As I walked through Melbourne’s Bourke Street Mall the other day, I overheard a conversation about the recent controversy surrounding Mark Zuckerberg’s private jet being tracked by a college student. The irony wasn’t lost on me - or the people discussing it - that someone who built their fortune on the back of data exploitation is now caught in the same web.

It got me thinking about the double standards that exist in the world of tech and surveillance capitalism. Zuckerberg’s critics are quick to point out that he’s profiting off the personal data of millions of Facebook users, while he’s also trying to keep his own life out of the spotlight. The comment from user-5508481213173424136 stuck with me: “I like the irony of people like Zuckerberg who made billions by exploiting the data of his user base but the second people start watching his data, it’s a big deal.”