Reading through property discussions online lately has sparked some thoughts about the peculiar relationship we have with home ownership in this country. The recurring theme of “property regret” keeps surfacing, particularly from first-time buyers questioning their decisions.

One discussion caught my eye - a young professional wrestling with doubt after purchasing an apartment in a desirable suburb. Despite ticking all the right boxes - great location, manageable mortgage, lifestyle fit - they’re haunted by the nagging feeling that they should have stretched for a house or townhouse instead.

Recent headlines proudly proclaim Australia’s position as second globally for median personal wealth, but these numbers deserve a closer look. The reality beneath the surface tells a more complex story about what true wealth means in our economic landscape.

Looking at property values between comparable cities raises some interesting questions. Take Chicago and Sydney - while a beautiful inner-city home in Chicago might fetch USD 1.6 million, a similar property in Sydney could command AUD 4-5 million. Does this make the Sydney homeowner genuinely wealthier? The GDP per capita between these cities suggests otherwise.

The latest headlines about households earning $500,000 struggling with mortgages initially made me roll my eyes. My immediate reaction was typical - here we go again, another story about wealthy people complaining about their first-world problems. But diving deeper into the discussions, there’s actually more nuance to unpack here.

Looking at the raw numbers, a household income of $500,000 translates to roughly $304,000 after tax. Sounds fantastic, right? But then reality hits: $84,000 per year for childcare (with minimal or no subsidies at that income level), $153,000 in mortgage repayments for a $2 million loan, plus all the usual expenses of running a household. Suddenly that seemingly enormous income doesn’t look so enormous anymore.