There’s something deeply unsettling about watching the people who are supposed to be investigating serious crimes get caught up in what looks like political surveillance theater. The recent photos of Attorney General Pam Bondi’s binder showing search histories of Congress members looking through unredacted Epstein files has me thinking about just how far down the rabbit hole we’ve gone when it comes to privacy, power, and who’s watching whom.

The whole situation is a mess of contradictions that would be almost comical if it weren’t so serious. On one hand, we’ve got lawmakers accessing sensitive documents on government systems—systems that are, by design, monitored. That’s not exactly shocking. Anyone who’s worked in IT (and I’ve spent enough years in the trenches) knows that everything you do on a work computer is logged. Every search, every file access, every email. It’s Security 101.

Nearly a million people have signed a petition against the UK’s proposed digital ID scheme, and frankly, I’m not surprised. What started as half a million signatures has exploded past the 800,000 mark and keeps climbing. When you see numbers like that, you know something has struck a nerve.

The whole thing reminds me of conversations I’ve had with mates here in Melbourne about the MyGov digital services rollout. Sure, it’s convenient when it works, but there’s always that nagging feeling that you’re handing over more control than you’re getting back in return. The UK situation feels like that, but dialled up to eleven.