Remember when browsers were just tools to access the internet? Those simpler days seem increasingly distant as I read about Perplexity’s latest announcement regarding their new browser that plans to track “everything users do online” for hyper-personalized advertising. The brazenness of this declaration is both shocking and sadly unsurprising.

The tech industry’s relentless push toward surveillance capitalism has reached a new milestone. Gone are the days of subtle privacy invasions buried in lengthy terms of service agreements. Now, companies proudly announce their intentions to monitor every aspect of our digital lives, packaging it as a feature rather than the privacy nightmare it truly is.

The tech industry never ceases to amaze me with its tone-deaf approaches to user privacy. Today’s exhibit: Perplexity’s CEO proudly announcing their new browser will track everything users do online to deliver “hyper-personalized” ads. Reading this news over my morning batch brew, I couldn’t help but wonder if we’ve entered some bizarre parallel universe where privacy invasion is now a selling point.

Let’s be clear about something - nobody is sitting at home thinking, “Gee, I wish my browser would track me more thoroughly so I can get better ads!” The sheer disconnect between Silicon Valley executives and actual users has reached new heights of absurdity.

Looking at the recent news about Discord implementing face scanning for age verification, I’m struck by a familiar sinking feeling. The same one I got when Facebook started pushing for real names, when Instagram began demanding phone numbers, and now as Discord joins the parade of platforms wanting to scan our faces.

The justification seems reasonable enough on the surface - protecting minors online is crucial. But there’s something deeply unsettling about a company that already has a questionable track record with privacy now wanting biometric data from its users. This is the same platform that has consistently refused to implement end-to-end encryption, claiming it would only benefit criminals.

The tech world is buzzing with Microsoft’s latest announcement about reintroducing the Recall feature into Windows, and not in a good way. Having spent decades in IT, watching the evolution of Windows from a simple operating system to what it’s becoming today has been quite the journey - and not entirely a pleasant one.

Remember when we actually owned our computers? When the operating system was just that - a system to operate our machine? Those days seem increasingly distant as Microsoft continues its march toward turning Windows into a data-harvesting platform disguised as a helpful tool.

The tech world is buzzing with OpenAI’s latest move - their new image generation model appears to have significantly reduced restrictions on creating images of public figures. This shift marks a fascinating and somewhat concerning evolution in AI capabilities, particularly around the creation of synthetic media.

Working in tech, I’ve watched the progression of AI image generation from its early days of bizarre, melted-face abstractions to today’s photorealistic outputs. The latest iteration seems to have taken a massive leap forward, not just in quality but in what it’s willing to create. The examples floating around social media range from amusing to unsettling - everything from politicians in unexpected scenarios to reimagined historical figures.

The tech world is buzzing with Apple’s recent decision to pull Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK, following pressure from the British government. This move has sparked intense discussions about privacy, government overreach, and the future of digital security.

Let’s be clear about what’s happening here. Apple didn’t implement a backdoor - they simply removed the enhanced encryption feature for UK users. While this isn’t ideal, it’s arguably better than compromising the entire encryption system with a government-mandated backdoor. At least now, UK users know exactly where they stand regarding their data security.

Looking through my phone this morning, scrolling past countless photos of my teenage daughter’s school events and family gatherings, I found myself thinking about digital privacy. Recent news about law enforcement officers sharing a woman’s private photos after an illegal phone search has left me feeling deeply unsettled.

The digital age has brought unprecedented challenges to our privacy. While most of us worry about hackers or corporate data breaches, there’s an equally concerning threat from those who are supposed to protect us. The incident where deputies accessed and shared a woman’s intimate photos without consequences isn’t just a violation of privacy - it’s an abuse of power that should shock anyone who values basic human dignity.

The recent news about the UK government ordering Apple to disable Advanced Data Protection has sent shockwaves through the tech community, and rightfully so. This isn’t just another local policy decision - it’s a concerning move that could have global implications for digital privacy.

Standing at my desk in my home office, looking at my iPhone and MacBook, I’m struck by the irony of the situation. Here we are, living in an era where digital security is more crucial than ever, yet governments seem determined to tear down the very protections we need.

Looking at the latest controversy surrounding Meta’s platforms, where they’ve mysteriously “hidden” posts about abortion pill providers, I’m struck by how predictable these “accidents” have become. The timing is particularly interesting, isn’t it? Just as reproductive rights become an increasingly heated political issue.

Remember when tech platforms were supposed to democratize information and give everyone a voice? Those idealistic days feel like ancient history now. These days, it seems every week brings another convenient “bug” that just happens to align with certain political interests.

The recent exodus of TikTok users to RedNote has left me both fascinated and deeply troubled. While sitting in my home office, watching this digital migration unfold, I can’t shake the feeling that we’re witnessing something more significant than just another app-switching trend.

The supposed logic behind this move is striking - users are protesting TikTok’s potential ban by jumping to an app with even stronger ties to the very concerns that sparked the ban discussion in the first place. It’s like watching someone protest food safety regulations by deliberately eating at an establishment with worse health violations.

Remember when mobile apps were just fun little diversions? Looking at the recent Wired article about location tracking through apps feels like watching a horror movie where the call is coming from inside the house. The scale of surveillance through seemingly innocent apps like Candy Crush and MyFitnessPal is staggering.

The tech industry has been playing fast and loose with our data for years, but this revelation takes it to a new level. Even when you explicitly deny location permissions, advertisers can still track you through IP addresses, WiFi networks, and even Bluetooth signals. The sheer number of compromised apps - over 15,000 - is mind-boggling. Just scrolling through the list made my stomach turn.

Remember installing a new game, gathering friends for a LAN party, and knowing that your purchase would last forever? Those days feel increasingly distant as modern gaming shifts towards “live service” models that can vanish at a publisher’s whim.

The “Stop Killing Games” movement has caught my attention lately, particularly as someone who still has a dusty collection of 90s PC games that work perfectly fine today. This European citizens’ initiative aims to protect consumer rights by requiring publishers to provide ways for players to keep their games running after official support ends.

The digital footprints we leave behind seem to multiply exponentially these days. Just last week, while checking my credit report (something I do religiously every few months), I stumbled upon a disturbing revelation that made me pause my batch brew mid-sip.

It turns out that simply checking your credit report can trigger automatic updates to various data aggregators like White Pages. The implications of this seemingly innocuous connection between services are frankly terrifying. While we’re all busy trying to protect our privacy in obvious ways - declining cookies, using secure passwords, maybe even dabbling with VPNs - our data is being traded behind the scenes like footy cards at a primary school.

Something rather unsettling happened on Reddit recently. Users discovered that comments they had deliberately overwritten and deleted years ago have mysteriously reappeared on their profiles. This isn’t just a minor glitch - it’s a stark reminder of how little control we actually have over our digital footprint.

The incident sparked quite a discussion about data retention practices. Several users shared their frustration upon finding their carefully scrubbed content had been restored without their consent. What’s particularly concerning is that many had used third-party tools specifically designed to help manage their digital privacy, only to find these efforts completely undermined.

Remember when the internet felt like the wild west of freedom and anonymity? Those days seem increasingly distant, particularly with the recent revelations about Reddit’s deepening integration with Google’s surveillance infrastructure.

Looking through my browser’s developer tools this morning, I noticed something disturbing - Reddit’s new interface (affectionately nicknamed “shreddit” by many) pings Google’s reCAPTCHA servers on every single page load. Not just during login, but every single time you view anything. This goes far beyond the typical bot prevention measures we’re familiar with.

The recent clash between Cloudflare and EU regulators has sparked an important conversation about digital privacy that hits close to home. While sipping my morning coffee and scrolling through tech news at my favourite Brunswick café, this story caught my eye, particularly because it reflects a broader struggle we’re all facing in the digital age.

Remember the days when the internet felt like the wild west? Those simpler times when we didn’t have to worry about every click being monitored? Now, we’re dealing with an increasingly complex web of surveillance and control, often justified under the banner of fighting piracy and protecting intellectual property.

The gaming giant Valve just made another consumer-friendly move by requiring developers to explicitly disclose when their games use kernel-level anti-cheat systems. While this might sound like technical jargon to some, it’s actually a significant step forward for transparency and user privacy.

Sitting here in my home office, glancing at my Steam library, I’m reminded of how far we’ve come from the days when gaming platforms treated users as mere wallet-carriers. Valve has consistently shown that it’s possible to run a profitable business while respecting user privacy and choice. Their move away from Google Analytics, preference for privacy-focused solutions, and tireless work on Linux gaming through Proton demonstrates a commitment that goes beyond mere lip service.

Remember when we used to joke about people walking around with computers on their faces? Well, that future is here, and it’s far more unsettling than we imagined. Recently, two clever university students demonstrated just how vulnerable we all are to surveillance by combining smart glasses with facial recognition and data mining.

The demonstration was honestly chilling. These students managed to modify a pair of smart glasses to identify random people on the street, pulling up their personal information in real-time. Phone numbers, addresses, and other private details - all available at a glance. The most disturbing part? One demonstration showed a woman who, upon hearing the student mention details about their previous connection, immediately felt at ease speaking with a complete stranger.