The tech industry never ceases to amaze me with its ability to create completely preventable problems. The recent revelations about North Korean IT workers infiltrating Fortune 500 companies have left me both frustrated and oddly unsurprised. While sipping my batch brew at my desk this morning, I couldn’t help but marvel at the sheer absurdity of the situation.

Remember when getting a job in tech meant endless rounds of technical interviews, personality assessments, and enough hoops to make a circus performer dizzy? Well, apparently, all you needed was to offer a slight discount and show up with some decent coding skills. The irony is palpable - legitimate developers are jumping through increasingly ridiculous hurdles while potential security threats waltz through the front door with a bargain-basement rate card.

The other day, my phone buzzed with yet another SMS about unpaid toll charges. Living in Melbourne where CityLink and EastLink are part of daily life, you’d think I might give it a second glance. But this one claimed to be from some toll road in Wyoming. Right, because I regularly pop over to Wyoming for a quick drive.

These scam messages have become so prevalent that the FBI recently issued a warning about them. It would be almost comical if it weren’t for the fact that these scammers are successfully preying on vulnerable people. The tactics they’re using are getting increasingly sophisticated, yet hilariously sloppy at the same time. Messages from Philippine phone numbers claiming to be US state police? Group texts to 30 random people all supposedly owing the exact same amount? It’s like they’re not even trying anymore.

The recent news about Grok AI’s security vulnerabilities has sparked quite a heated discussion in tech circles, and frankly, it’s both fascinating and concerning. Working in IT for over two decades, I’ve watched the pendulum swing between innovation and security countless times, but the current AI race feels different - more urgent, more consequential.

Reading through various discussions about Grok’s vulnerabilities, I’m struck by how many people seem to brush off security concerns with a casual “it’s just doing what users want” attitude. This kind of thinking reminds me of the early days of the internet when we were all excited about the possibilities but hadn’t yet learned the hard lessons about security that would come later.

The recent FBI warning about the Ghost ransomware group has sent ripples through the IT security community, and frankly, it’s bringing back some uncomfortable memories from my days managing enterprise systems. These attackers aren’t using sophisticated social engineering or elaborate phishing schemes - they’re simply walking through doors we’ve left wide open.

What really caught my attention was the mention of SharePoint and Exchange servers as primary targets. Working in corporate IT, I’ve witnessed firsthand the constant push-pull between security needs and executive demands for accessibility. It’s a tale as old as time in the tech world - management wants everything available from anywhere, while IT security teams quietly pull their hair out trying to maintain some semblance of protection.

Just when you thought the tech industry couldn’t get more bizarre, here we are watching a drama unfold that would be rejected as too far-fetched for a Netflix series. The latest revelation about a DOGE staffer’s previous dismissal from a cybersecurity company for leaking secrets reads like a plot from a rejected Silicon Valley episode.

The sheer absurdity of putting sensitive government systems in the hands of individuals who couldn’t pass basic security clearance checks is mind-boggling. Working in tech, I’ve had to jump through countless hoops just to access relatively mundane corporate systems. My junior developers need thorough background checks just to peek at our codebase. Yet somehow, we’re watching people waltz into positions handling potentially sensitive government data with apparently less vetting than what’s required to work at your local Bunnings.

The recent hack of the US Treasury Department has sparked quite a discussion in tech circles, and it’s hitting close to home for those of us who’ve spent time in government IT. Reading through the online commentary, there’s a clear pattern emerging about why these incidents keep happening, and it’s not just about technical vulnerabilities.

Working in tech, I’ve witnessed firsthand how government departments often struggle with the same fundamental issues: inadequate funding, rigid hiring practices, and an institutional resistance to change. The Treasury hack isn’t just a technical failure; it’s a symptom of a broader systemic problem.

Remember when we used to joke about not knowing what goes into our hot dogs? Well, it turns out we’re equally clueless about what goes into our electronics. Recent revelations about US companies being in the dark about their chip sources have got me thinking about the broader implications for our digital security.

The situation is both amusing and terrifying. Here we are, living in an age where we’re increasingly dependent on technology, yet half of US companies don’t even know where their chips come from. That’s like driving a car without knowing if the brakes were installed by a certified mechanic or your neighbour’s teenager.

Reading about the US government’s recent approval of $3 billion to remove Chinese telecoms equipment brought back memories of conversations I had with colleagues years ago. Back in 2015, while working on a government contract, we were already discussing the potential risks of foreign-made networking equipment. Many dismissed these concerns as paranoid, but here we are.

The cybersecurity landscape has shifted dramatically over the past decade. Working in IT, I’ve watched the gradual evolution from “buy whatever’s cheapest” to implementing zero-trust architectures and carefully vetting hardware suppliers. It’s fascinating how what was once considered conspiracy theory territory has become mainstream security policy.

The recent news about severed undersea cables between Finland and Sweden has sent shivers down my spine while sitting here in my home office. These aren’t just any cables - they’re vital digital arteries connecting entire nations to the global internet infrastructure.

What’s particularly unsettling is how this incident mirrors similar events we’ve witnessed recently. Last time I discussed this topic with my mate over coffee at Hardware Lane, we were talking about the Nord Stream pipeline incident. Now we’re seeing the same pattern of critical infrastructure being targeted, but this time it’s our digital lifelines.