<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Claude on Left 4 More</title><link>https://left4more.com/tags/claude/</link><description>Recent content in Claude on Left 4 More</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-au</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 02:27:05 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://left4more.com/tags/claude/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Chart That Launched a Thousand Pedants</title><link>https://left4more.com/posts/the-chart-that-launched-a-thousand-pedants/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 02:27:05 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://left4more.com/posts/the-chart-that-launched-a-thousand-pedants/</guid><description>&lt;p>Someone posted a graph this week. Model version number on the Y-axis, release date on the X-axis. The line goes up and to the right. The title called it &amp;ldquo;not quite exponential, but progress is progress.&amp;rdquo; It was a shitpost. A pretty good one.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The comments, predictably, split into three camps.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>First, the people who got it immediately and just typed &amp;ldquo;lol.&amp;rdquo; Second, the people who genuinely started analysing the graph before realising the Y-axis was just sequential model numbers. Honest mistake, to be fair. I probably would have done the same. Third, and most entertainingly, the people who did not get it and then got very annoyed at the first group for saying they didn&amp;rsquo;t get it.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>