The news hit this week that Google copped a $425 million fine for collecting user data despite privacy controls being in place. My first reaction? A weary shake of the head and a muttered “here we go again.” The more I read about it, the more frustrated I became - not just with Google, but with our entire approach to holding tech giants accountable.

The discussion threads I’ve been following are filled with the predictable mix of outrage and resignation. Someone pointed out that this fine represents roughly 0.7% of Google’s 2023 profit of $60 billion. To put that in perspective, if you earned $100,000 last year, this would be equivalent to a $700 fine. Would that stop you from doing something lucrative but legally questionable? Probably not.

The numbers are staggering, really. $155 billion spent on AI this year alone, with hundreds of billions more on the horizon. I’ve been mulling over this massive investment spree by big tech, and honestly, it’s got me feeling a bit like I’m watching a high-stakes poker game where everyone’s going all-in on what might be the hand of the century – or the biggest bluff in corporate history.

What strikes me most about the online discussions around this topic is how divided people are about whether we’re witnessing the next industrial revolution or the setup for the mother of all tech bubbles. Someone raised a pretty valid question: “How long can this go on before it pops?” And you know what? That’s exactly what I’ve been wondering myself.

The latest news about YouTube collecting selfies for AI-powered age verification has me genuinely concerned, and frankly, it should worry all of us. We’re witnessing another step in what feels like an inevitable march toward a surveillance state, wrapped up in the familiar packaging of “protecting the children.”

Don’t get me wrong - I understand the impulse to protect kids online. I’ve got a teenage daughter myself, and the internet can be a minefield for young people. But there’s something deeply unsettling about a mega-corporation like Google (YouTube’s parent company) building vast databases of our biometric data under the guise of age verification. It’s the classic privacy erosion playbook: identify a legitimate concern, propose a solution that massively overreaches, then act like anyone who objects doesn’t care about children’s safety.

The other day, while setting up a new development environment for work, I stumbled across an interesting discussion about self-hosting email servers. It brought back memories of my own attempts at email independence over the years, and the subsequent frustrations that followed.

Running your own email server used to be a badge of honor in the tech community. Back in the late 90s and early 2000s, it was almost a rite of passage for system administrators and tech enthusiasts. The technical challenges were significant but manageable - configuring Sendmail or Postfix, setting up spam filters, and maintaining proper DNS records.

Yesterday’s announcement about Gmail’s end-to-end encryption had me rolling my eyes harder than when my daughter tries to convince me TikTok is perfectly safe. Google’s latest attempt to appear privacy-conscious feels about as genuine as a $3 note.

Let’s be crystal clear about what’s happening here. This isn’t true end-to-end encryption (E2EE) being offered to regular Gmail users. Instead, it’s a corporate-focused feature specifically designed for Google Workspace customers who actually pay for their services. The reasoning isn’t hard to follow - Google’s bread and butter comes from scanning our emails to feed their advertising machine.