I’ve been sitting here this morning, staring at my phone in disbelief. The Federal Trade Commission – you know, the agency supposedly tasked with protecting consumers and maintaining fair competition – is now apparently in the business of telling Apple News which political outlets it should promote. Specifically, they want more Fox News and Breitbart stories pushed to users.

Let me just say that again for those in the back: a government agency is demanding a private company promote specific political content.

The news that broke over the weekend about TikTok being tweaked to become “100% MAGA” has been rattling around in my head like a loose screw in an old MacBook. It’s one of those stories that makes you pause mid-sip of your morning latte and wonder if we’ve finally crossed some invisible line into full dystopian territory.

What strikes me most about this whole situation isn’t just the brazen nature of it – though that’s certainly something. It’s how perfectly it illustrates a pattern we’ve been watching unfold across the digital landscape for years now. The systematic capture of information infrastructure by those who understand that controlling the narrative is far more effective than winning hearts and minds through actual policy.

There’s something deeply unsettling about watching democracy crumble in real-time from across the Pacific. The recent ruling that Trump’s firing of FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter was unlawful should feel like a victory for the rule of law, but honestly, it feels more like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

The judge’s decision is clear: Trump violated protections for independent agency officials, and Slaughter remains a “rightful member” of the FTC. It’s the kind of ruling that would have meant something in, say, 2015. But we’re living in a different world now, one where “lawful” and “unlawful” have become increasingly meaningless terms when applied to those in power.