<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ai-Agents on Left 4 More</title><link>https://left4more.com/tags/ai-agents/</link><description>Recent content in Ai-Agents on Left 4 More</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-au</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:21:49 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://left4more.com/tags/ai-agents/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI Agents and the Disaster We're Probably Earning</title><link>https://left4more.com/posts/ai-agents-and-the-disaster-were-probably-earning/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:21:49 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://left4more.com/posts/ai-agents-and-the-disaster-were-probably-earning/</guid><description>&lt;p>There&amp;rsquo;s a thing that happens in tech where a capability goes from &amp;ldquo;theoretical concern&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;completely normal&amp;rdquo; without anyone really deciding that transition was okay. I&amp;rsquo;ve been watching it happen with AI agents over the past year or so, and it&amp;rsquo;s starting to sit uncomfortably with me.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Not long ago, the conversation was about chatbots giving wrong answers. Hallucinating citations. Confidently explaining that the capital of Australia is Sydney. Embarrassing, but contained. The blast radius was: someone got bad information and maybe acted on it. Bad, but recoverable.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>