The property investment debate has reared its head again, and frankly, it’s about time. The Parliamentary Budget Office recently dropped some numbers that have got everyone talking: 80% of capital gains tax discount benefits flow to the top 10% of earners, while 60% of negative gearing benefits go to the top 20%. When you put it like that, it’s pretty stark, isn’t it?

What’s fascinating is watching the responses unfold online. There’s this persistent narrative that any changes to negative gearing would devastate mum-and-dad investors, but the reality seems far more nuanced. One user made an excellent point about how properties naturally become more positively geared over time, meaning established investors with multiple properties would largely be unaffected by changes. It’s really the high-income earners buying expensive coastal properties with terrible rental yields who’d feel the pinch – and honestly, that doesn’t sound like such a tragedy.

I’ve been staring at my screen for the better part of an hour, trying to process what I just watched. Google’s Genie 3 demo has left me in that peculiar state where you’re simultaneously amazed and deeply unsettled - like watching a magic trick that you know will somehow change everything, but you’re not sure if you want it to.

The technology itself is genuinely mind-blowing. We’re talking about AI that can generate interactive 3D worlds from simple prompts, complete with physics, lighting, and persistent environments that don’t collapse the moment you look away. Someone mentioned it feels like Star Trek’s holodeck, and honestly, that comparison isn’t far off. The difference is we’re not in 2364 - we’re in 2025, and this stuff is happening in real research labs.

The gig economy promised to democratise everything - from taxi rides to accommodation. But what happens when the tools meant to empower everyday entrepreneurs become weapons for systematic fraud? A recent case involving an Airbnb host using AI-generated images to fabricate thousands of dollars in damages has me thinking about how quickly our technological progress can be weaponised against ordinary people.

The story is infuriating in its simplicity. A guest books a long-term stay, backs out, and suddenly faces a $9,000 damage claim complete with convincing photos of destroyed property. Except the photos were AI-generated fakes. The host, described as a “superhost” no less, had apparently decided that a bit of digital forgery was an acceptable way to extract revenge money from someone who dared to cancel their booking.

The numbers are staggering, really. $155 billion spent on AI this year alone, with hundreds of billions more on the horizon. I’ve been mulling over this massive investment spree by big tech, and honestly, it’s got me feeling a bit like I’m watching a high-stakes poker game where everyone’s going all-in on what might be the hand of the century – or the biggest bluff in corporate history.

What strikes me most about the online discussions around this topic is how divided people are about whether we’re witnessing the next industrial revolution or the setup for the mother of all tech bubbles. Someone raised a pretty valid question: “How long can this go on before it pops?” And you know what? That’s exactly what I’ve been wondering myself.

There’s something deeply satisfying about finding a good deal, isn’t there? Maybe it’s the thrill of the hunt, or perhaps it’s that smug feeling you get when you know you’re paying less than everyone else for the same service. Whatever it is, I found myself completely absorbed in a recent discussion about mobile phone plans that someone had shared - a comprehensive spreadsheet comparing all the cheapest Optus reseller plans.

Sometimes you stumble across something so beautifully absurd that it perfectly captures the madness of trying to please everyone. This week, someone spotted a packet at their local Aldi that had me chuckling into my morning latte: “Non regional battered potato circles.”

The packaging was clearly the result of some marketing team’s fever dream - an attempt to create a product name so generic, so diplomatically neutral, that it wouldn’t offend anyone’s regional sensibilities. The result? Pure comedy gold that managed to upset absolutely everyone while simultaneously being completely correct.

Been scrolling through Reddit again during my lunch break, and stumbled across one of those posts that hits way too close to home. Someone desperately trying to track down a mysterious stench in their kitchen - that awful combination of death, rotting food, and something that might charitably be described as digestive distress. The poor soul had already done the full forensic investigation routine: removed everything, wiped down every surface, sniffed every container. Still nothing.

There’s something beautifully absurd about Melbourne’s suburbs that never fails to make me smile. We’re a city that embraces the weird, the wonderful, and the downright eccentric. Case in point: the legendary can wall on South Road that’s been growing steadily since the pandemic began, and apparently now has its own documentary.

For those not in the know, this is exactly what it sounds like - someone’s been methodically building a wall of aluminium cans visible from the street, and it’s become something of a local phenomenon. People drive past it on their daily commutes, watching it grow can by can, and now there’s even video documentation of the whole enterprise. The internet being what it is, everyone’s got an opinion about it.

The latest news about YouTube collecting selfies for AI-powered age verification has me genuinely concerned, and frankly, it should worry all of us. We’re witnessing another step in what feels like an inevitable march toward a surveillance state, wrapped up in the familiar packaging of “protecting the children.”

Don’t get me wrong - I understand the impulse to protect kids online. I’ve got a teenage daughter myself, and the internet can be a minefield for young people. But there’s something deeply unsettling about a mega-corporation like Google (YouTube’s parent company) building vast databases of our biometric data under the guise of age verification. It’s the classic privacy erosion playbook: identify a legitimate concern, propose a solution that massively overreaches, then act like anyone who objects doesn’t care about children’s safety.

Been scrolling through some discussions about the incoming administration’s plan to axe the IRS Direct File program, and honestly, it’s got me pretty wound up. Here we have a rare example of government actually making life easier for ordinary people, and what happens? It gets killed off faster than you can say “corporate lobbying.”

For those who missed it, Direct File was this brilliant little program that let people with simple tax situations file their returns directly through the IRS website - completely free. No third-party software, no hidden fees, no upselling to premium versions. Just a straightforward government service that worked exactly as advertised. Revolutionary stuff, apparently.